The Copenhagen Post

Thursday
September 2nd
Banner
Front page News National Fighter jet contract goes down

Fighter jet contract goes down

E-mail Print

The Joint Strike Fighter saga has apparently come to an end after several years of negotiations with the US government


After a week where it was announced there would be yet another price increase for potential buyers, the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is no longer being considered by the Danish Defence Command as a replacement for its aging F-16s war planes, reports public broadcaster DR.


Since negotiations for purchasing the planes began in 1999 between Denmark and US Department of Defense – which has been heavily involved in the development of the Lockheed Martin jet – the cost of a single plane has risen from around 275 million kroner to 540 million.

The JSF project has been plagued with problems since its inception. The original release date for the plane was set for 2012, although now US officials say the jet will not be ready until 2016. In addition, the project took a major hit last month when the man heading it was fired by US Defence Secretary, Robert Gates,due to the jet’s continued development delays.

Despite having invested considerably in the JSF project – with several companies securing eventual work contracts for the planes should they have been purchased – the Danish government is now leaning toward Boeing’s F-18 Superhornet as its preferred choice.

In April last year, Boeing promised to ensure orders worth up to 20 billion kroner for Danish companies if the military purchased the company’s Superhornet model.

A decision on which jet will replace the F-16s is expected to be made by parliament some time in 2012.

Comments
Only CPHPOST registered users can write comments!
sunnchilde  - What do you really need?   |2010-03-16 23:07:50
It's too bad the US isn't marketing the F-35 at a reasonable rate, but it seems to me the most important question is "What exactly do we need to protect ourselves?"
Instead of buying the bazooka fighter that's the latest and greatest, instead closely determine just exactly what are threats that you will encounter?
If a civilian airliner is highjacked, you don't need an F-22 Raptor with "super cruise" and radar-evading technology to shoot it down.
If some hostile nation wanted to attack Denmark, they'd also have to attack every other NATO country to do it.
What I'm trying to say is that Denmark doesn't have to spend a fortune on defense, because no one would dare attack you.
tomnashdk   |2010-03-17 10:53:04
More Danish layoffs on the way...

Several Danish companies are already established and active suppliers for the F-35. It doesn't take a genius to understand that those Danish suppliers will eventually and systematically be replaced with suppliers from countries that still participate in the program.

I think the decision makes sense overall, but there will be repercussions for innocent bystanders.
JFD  - @ Sunchilde   |2010-03-17 11:46:23
At a bare minimum, every country needs a military in order to "expect the unexpected". But more importantly, the DK military is often a contributor to peacekeeping activities thru the UN and NATO, e.g. Middle East, Bosnia, etc. Therefore, what is wrong with keeping the miliatry up-to-date so Danish troops are not vulnerable thru the use of old technology during the bona fide missions?

Granted, the cost of the F-35 began to outweigh benefits, but your comments are rather pedstrian and short sighted.
 

 

 

 

 

Focus on

 

Failing the grade

A lack of international schools, especially those offering the International Baccalaureat...

 

Home sweet home?

Take part in the on-going debate over the quality of life for foreign professionals in De...

 

A gift in a time of crisis

The national government owes it to the rest of the country to promote growth in Greater C...
 



JP International

The Tales of Hans Christian Andersen