The Copenhagen Post

Thursday
September 2nd
Banner
Front page News National Bodyguards back protecting cartoonist

Bodyguards back protecting cartoonist

E-mail Print

Mohammed cartoonist Kurt Westergaard to receive round-the-clock security but at a steep cost

After the apparent attempt on Kurt Westergaard’s life last week, the Danish Security and Intelligence Service PET will resume the 24-hour surveillance and protection of the Mohammed cartoonist.

With 30 agents needed to provide round-the-clock cover and the average annual salary for a PET agent ranging from 650,000 to 750,000 kroner, the cost of protecting Westergaard will amount to about 19.5 million kroner a year, according to Politiken newspaper.

The decision to provide extra security for Westergaard was made by Justice Minister Brian Mikkelsen after consulting PET head Jakob Scharf.

Westergaard’s house in Århus, Jutland is already kitted out with special security locks on the doors, video surveillance, panic alarms and a special reinforced safe room, where he sought sanctuary when an armed man broke into his home on New Year’s Day.

Meanwhile, police have been presented with new evidence in the case of the attack on Westergaard.

TV2 reports that a local news crew, which arrived on the scene shortly after the attack, found a SIM card. It is now being examined by police technicians and while police won’t confirm that it belongs to the 28-year-old suspect, they have said that ‘the place of purchase [of the card] is very interesting’.

Police hope that if the SIM card does belong to the suspect, investigators can trace who the man has previously been in contact with.

Comments
Only CPHPOST registered users can write comments!
Eastard  - Confused Reporting   |2010-01-07 14:56:30
I doubt if the Danish government will hire 30 new agents for this task therefore the cost is not new money... it is a choice of where to deploy the men... If Denmark allows a terrorist organization to assisinate their citizens in Denmark for lawful public statements then you will be ignoring the millions who have fought in time for your freedom. Do not underestimate the importance of the free press lest you have a mosk in your backyard..
npandjmclay  - Eastard....   |2010-01-08 22:38:53
It's called 'opportunity cost' - ie if the money is spent on the sad, mad cartoonist it can't be spent on something worthwhile, like keeping potential terrorists out of gala functions for senior politicians from 190 countries.

KW exploited his 'fame' by promoting a book in the USA: a cynical act which poured fuel on the flames.

Can't he and his ilk understand that it ain't clever to provoke terror?
James  - npandjmclay   |2010-01-11 03:14:14
Promoting freedom of speech is not cynical, its admirable. It can hardly be argued that KW's life has been made better by publishing the cartoons - his fame is of the kind that no one would desire for themselves.

If you don't stand up to extremist then they win. I am proud KW has not shrunk away from society and think the 'opportunity cost' of sacrificing freedom of speech is much greater than you estimate. I don't mean to be rude but I doubt you have ever lived in a society where freedom of speech is denied....
npandjmclay  - James   |2010-01-11 09:25:41
The lack of judgement displayed by Jyllands Posten in publishing the cartoons cannot be defended as 'fredom of speech'. It was rank bad politics by any standards. KW then piled Pelion upon Ossa by publicising his own part in the débacle. He now insists on staying in his own house at huge expense to the rest of us, playing the victim. Perpetrators of unwise acts are not victims. As for your last comment, I have experience of many cultures where respect for religions counts for something. Why do people here have to deny that respect?
JFD   |2010-01-11 10:40:27
Remember James, that "freedom of speach" gives a person/corporation the ability (with certain boundaries) to communicate something without the reprisal of government prosecution, i.e. PUNISHMENT.

It does not, however, give that entity immunity from the CONSEQUENCES of their speach.

For example, if you break the law and are sent to jail. Jail is the punishment, if you happen to loose the respect of your family and friends, as well as ýour job, then these are the consequences.

No one has ever doubted that KW & JP had the right to publish the cartoons. But what is happening now is that they did this twice and exploited/benefitte/profited from the publicity in the name of "free speach" with irresponsible disregard for the consequences, and now are turning to the tax-payers to exmpt them from the consequences.
Eastard  - To all Commenting   |2010-01-11 15:04:34
Good opposing comments with useful perspectives.

There is continued avoidance of the fundamental issue of a foreign religion deciding what Danish cartoonists can print. Remember, innocent people were killed across the world as a result of this cartoon. This was a few notches beyond offensive... There is no excuse for this... especially when you use the word "respect"... They do not respect anyone and continue looking for a reason to show their power of fear.

The discussion of consequences was very interesting... It still comes down to allowing or not the assasination of one of your citizens for a reason that is acceptable in your country... free speech. Keep in mind that free speech is not speaking about only those things you agree with or those things that are acceptable agains a world social/religious filter. The cartoon was a represntation of a growing world opinion that was not suprizing. The consequences for KW are not the same as commiting a crime (individual wrongful act)... I am not aware that he commited a crime in Denmark. His consequences are a foreign violent religion imposing a death sentence on him. I find this horribly wrong of them much more than KW. His profiting off this is suprizing however it will be difficult to spend his big money. He will probably need the money to stay alive. The world has a very long list of those that spoke up against tyanny.I see KW's original work as the concequence of organized religious terrorist behaviour. Exactly how would one depeict their god given the followers actions...?

Freedom is not easy, or cheap, or without resistance.Freedom is not a religion and does not answer to it in most countries.
mig selv   |2010-01-11 22:03:28
"Do not underestimate the importance of the free press lest you have a mosk in your backyard."

Seems like someone misunderstands the reason we have freedom of speech.
npandjmclay  - Yes.....   |2010-01-12 07:41:21
Freedom has a room-mate: responsibility. They're inseparable.
JFD  - well put np ...   |2010-01-13 13:42:31
... afterall
just because you CAN
doesn't mean you SHOULD
and certainly doesn mean you MUST
 

 

 

 

 

Focus on

 

Failing the grade

A lack of international schools, especially those offering the International Baccalaureat...

 

Home sweet home?

Take part in the on-going debate over the quality of life for foreign professionals in De...

 

A gift in a time of crisis

The national government owes it to the rest of the country to promote growth in Greater C...
 



JP International

The Tales of Hans Christian Andersen