The Copenhagen Post

Thursday
March 18th
Banner
Front page News Local Graffiti explosion in the cities

Graffiti explosion in the cities

E-mail Print

City graffiti has risen dramatically in the past five years (Photo: Wesley Spyke)Graffiti is a growing problem in the largest cities but some politicians believe street art is okay

Copenhagen City Council’s graffiti-fighting unit has been a failure according to new figures, reports Politiken newspaper.

In just five years, instances of graffiti covering the walls, trains and other property in Copenhagen have nearly tripled, going from 5586 to 14,017.

Rail service DSB has been an especially open target for taggers, where the bill for removing unwanted paint from cars will run to about 18 million kroner this year, according to the company.

The city of Århus has also been fighting a losing battle against graffiti, with the amount of it increasing by 25 percent in five years.

But some politicians don’t believe graffiti is such a huge problem. Unsightly ‘tags’ are a plague, while ‘street art’ is something altogether different, say two prominent city councillors.

‘To me there’s a big difference between putting idiotic tags on a wall that a housing association has just painted and making a true artistic statement,’ said Klaus Bondam, head of the city’s technical and environmental department.

‘I think street art can be interesting and even be something that can create a new perspective on a place or object in the city.’

Pia Allerslev, head of the city’s cultural department, agreed.

‘The more innocent depictions that can make you smile and don’t destroy the public domain are okay,’ she said.

Both she and Bondam stressed, however, that graffiti which defaced public or private property was unacceptable.

Comments
Only CPHPOST registered users can write comments!
magic1964  - 90% graffities are ugly...   |2009-10-13 12:42:17
The problem is that 90% of graffities are just idiotic, ugly and ruin the view.....beside that I think some politicians should invite those artists to tag their own nice homes....
wor  - Sanctioned graffiti areas   |2009-10-13 16:29:38
...are needed where, and maybe people could join a list that gives them access to those areas.

Near where I live, there is a house that has a wall where the owners have given permission to graffiti artists to do their thing - nice! But otherwise those "tags" look a mess.
Tags are only good when someone has done a very nice piece of graffiti, and then signs it with a "DEF" tag.

Possible list of sacntioned sites could include:-

1) Politicians Homes who "don’t believe graffiti is such a huge problem"
(Good idea magic)
myob1776  - A sign of decay   |2009-10-14 03:37:39
This was a big problem in NYC in the 70s and also in the early 80s. It paralleled the general decay of the city, and was one of the things that Rudy Giuliani worked to eradicate. While it is a minor, 'quality of life' crime, it is one of those that needs to be stopped or it will lead to other offenses. There is nothing wrong with having sanctioned places for 'street art.' Some of it is quite expressive and artistic. But tolerating widespread vandalism is not the road that CPH wants to go down.
USvisitor  - ALL grafitti is vandalism...   |2009-10-14 12:12:08
All grafitti "deface(s) public or private property " BY DEFINITION!

If I were a property owner whose building was "tagged", I would consider my property vandalized, and I'd have to spend money to have it removed. Whether a politician feels that it's art or not is irrelevant.
 

 

Focus on

 

Failing the grade

A lack of international schools, especially those offering the International Baccalaureat...

 

Home sweet home?

Take part in the on-going debate over the quality of life for foreign professionals in De...

 

A gift in a time of crisis

The national government owes it to the rest of the country to promote growth in Greater C...

Copenhagen Podcast



image

 



JP International

The Tales of Hans Christian Andersen