The Copenhagen Post

Thursday
March 18th
Banner
Front page News International Mohammed cartoonist to speak at Yale

Mohammed cartoonist to speak at Yale

E-mail Print

Free speech will be on the agenda when Kurt Westergaard and Lars Hedegaard visit students at Yale

The artist behind the infamous Mohammed cartoon, Kurt Westergaard, and the president of the International Free Press Society, Lars Hedegaard, will speak to Yale University students as a new book about the cartoon crisis is set to be published.

Yale University Press, an autonomous publishing house associated with the university, is releasing Danish author Jytte Clausen’s book ‘The Cartoons That Shook The World’ on Monday. The publisher has removed images of the cartoons from the book, reasoning that they might incite violence.

Westergaard’s cartoon, which depicts the prophet Mohammed with a bomb in his turban, was first published by Jyllands-Posten newspaper in 2005.

He and Hedegaard have been invited by a student organisation to speak at the university campus on 1 October, just three days after the book’s scheduled release.

Hedegaard told The Copenhagen Post that he would talk about the background of the crisis and the situation today. He expected Westergaard to talk about his art and what he wanted to express through his drawings.

The timing of the talk was appropriate, he said.

‘The decision of Yale University Press is of course despicable and a sign of censorship and fear. It’s a sad comment of our times that a well-respected company should bow to fear of threats,’ Hedegaard said.

Hedegaard also noted that 30 September is the fourth anniversary of the original publication of the drawings and announced plans to establish an annual event promoting free speech.

When asked if creating an International Free Speech Day on the cartoon anniversary would stir up negative feelings, Hedegaard said that it was not his intention to offend people.

‘We are simply making a statement that we have free speech in our country so that any ideology, or group or political party can be exposed to ridicule,’ said Hedegaard. ‘We can’t control people’s feelings’.

Comments
Only CPHPOST registered users can write comments!
mgazelle  - There is a difference   |2009-09-25 19:03:36
Where every one should respect the freedom of speech, there should be a respect for religions, societies, and feelings as well.
As Hedegaard mentioned "We can’t control people’s feelings", this goes the same for someone who is religious. Expressing an Idea and having an opinion is everyone's right. This goes though with respect for the others! Not for nothing, we have rules in every country which should be respected and followed, otherwise every one can just do everything even if it harms the rest.
Brazidas  - Where ?   |2009-09-26 04:19:19
Ppl should 1st of all respect the laws and manners of the places they enter.

When they reach, nothing in hands except begs for help they agree to abide to the country laws, after they want to change the place which received them bringing the old habits from the lands they've abandoned ?

Time to think again.
npandjmclay  - Sensitivity   |2009-09-26 10:47:39
It's a fine line between justifying a contentious act and exploiting it for profit. I supported the original case that the cartoonists were free to do what they did, but I'm less convinced that they have a moral right to rub salt in the wounds they caused.
kvotolato3  - Amen   |2009-09-26 11:04:34
Could not agree with you more, mgazelle. Thanks.
mgazelle  - Is this to the point?   |2009-09-26 11:34:33
I do not know if Brazidas comment is related to this article! The discussion is about a speech, I do think is more for the pocket and the own glory than it is anything about freedom of speech. I do support all forms of freedoms, but certainly not when it comes to insultations.
tomnashdk   |2009-09-26 11:55:11
‘The decision of Yale University Press is of course despicable and a sign of censorship and fear. It’s a sad comment of our times that a well-respected company should bow to fear of threats,’ Hedegaard said.

This is where Hedegaard, Westergaard, and Rose are just as bad as the Muslim extremists they attempt to ridicule, and goes to a larger issue than freedom of the press.

Just because you can, does not mean you should. Was it really necessary to insult an entire religion because Vestergaard and company cannot tell the difference between a suicide bomber and a normal everyday practitioner of Islam?

The decision of Yale University Press is of course NOT a despicable and a sign of censorship and fear, rather it is a responsible mature sign of respect for 1.5 billion people who peacefully practice Islam. It is the same decision that was made by BBC, CNN, Reuters, the NY Times, and a huge collection of the rest of the world's free press. Is Vestergaard going to claim that JP is a more responsible news organization than 99% of the world's press?

This whole freedom of the press argument is nothing more than a Danish attempt to excuse childish bad behavior with lofty proclamations. I don't buy it. I hope the students at Yale are astute enough to raise this argument with Vestergaard, and let's see what his reply is.
Constantin  - .   |2009-09-26 16:15:42
I'm with npandjmclay on this one.

And by the way, "fourth anniversary"?

You just drew a f***ing cartoon for christ's sake, get over it and your pompous self.
Brazidas  - yes it is   |2009-09-26 21:40:51
mgazelle

The discussion is about "freedom of speech" not about a speech.

When I mention the laws and uses of a given country, I am mentioning Denmark and all countries which observe freedom and freedom of speech.

We cannot expect that ppl come from abroad bringing in cohercitive and repressive ways when it's not western way to do things.

They are welcome always, but they become well-suited when they respect the place they are coming in.

No, we cannot abide to acts of physical violence to punish - unlawfully - acts that "hurt" someone sensibilities.

The truth ? some ppl seize little things like a cartoon as a chance to make themselves known. That's low politics.
magic1964   |2009-09-27 03:24:24
During the lifetime of the USSR, it was customary for the Russian Communists , to attempt to silence anyone who disagreed with their Marxist ideology. So they resorted to vilifying their adversaries by painting them as “bourgeois reactionaries” and “enemies of the toiling masses.”

Nowadays, we find a similar strategy being used by Islamists and some “moderate” Muslims. They work hard to silence anyone who unveils the belligerent components of Islam. One of their tactics is to brand critics of Islam as manifesting “Islamophobia and racism.”
mgazelle  - It is just the same ambrella   |2009-09-27 11:56:54
IF we all agree that everyone is free to express his opinion then you have to agree that these cartoons do harm muslims and they a re a sign of a respectless handling. I mean the same goes the other way around too! I would react the same way, if a muslim or any one else is going to have cartoons of Jesus or Abraham or who ever from the prophets! It is always the messenger of a certain religion and I do respect all religions! It is not more and not less then this. Respecting laws is a completely different story. I do not think that in this article we read above, someone is doing something against law! And if then this is respectless too! I just have have the right to say that the cartoons business is a political and a commercial case more than a "Freedom" matter!
wor  - Straffeloven § 266 b   |2009-09-29 11:47:44
I,ve posted a comment similar to this before.

We are free to the point where we do not limit the freedom of others or incite hatred as pointed out in Straffeloven § 266 b, relating to scornful degradation based on race, skin clour, ethnic origin, faith, or sexual orientation. (https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=121398)

Do the "Mohammed cartoons" breach Straffeloven § 266 b?

It is plain to see that the drawings were an attack.
If they really wanted to be constructiive, they should have printed "existing" drawings/paintings of Muhammed that have be available for a long time in the Muslim/Arabic world, and then use that as the basis of a true discussion.

Since people are often saying Danish law allows this and that, and that we should follow it, THEN we should also follow Straffeloven § 266 b
Constantin  - .   |2009-09-29 11:53:03
People, I get offended when someone says bad things about pork chops. Does that constitute a bitching/threatening reaction on my part?

People will get offended by anything, bad things about their mommies, bad things about the FC they support, bad things about their very own god, bad things about their country...

Let's just shut the f00k up then, eh?
wor  - Constantin   |2009-09-29 13:50:50
It not just what you say, it's the way that you say it...and that's what gets results. You can replace the word "results" with "reacted to"

The question is: Does one with speak with class?
Constantin  - .   |2009-09-29 17:21:24
I don't mean to sound bitter, and I certainly don't condone this whole "freedom of speech" hype that came up with that issue, but I don't an argument based on "what if" works out in any case. "What if they made their point in a more polite/respective way?" "What if the cartoon did not depict Mohammed but a random Muslim guy?".

Point is, it was only a cartoon. A one-panel strip, a single sketch. There are t-shirts out there with "Mary was a virgin if you don't count anal" and several other aesthetically defunct ideas, mottos, cartoons, movies, opinions, states and gods. There are three options to this stuff:

a) We get insulted by anything we feel attacks something we cherish: my pork chops or Mohammed.

b) We don't really care what the other person is saying, we mostly care about THE WAY he or she says it.

c) We don't give credit to all the billions of little things that in one way or another could be found to be insulting and just go on with our lives that will not change either way by those mundane facts.

Option a: a whinning p*ssy.
Option b: a hypocrite.
Option c: a person past childhood.
wor  - The no fault policy   |2009-09-29 17:52:10
Presenting a point of view in a constructive, and well put WAY, allows the core of what one is saying not to be misconstrued.

For example, if there is a crazy reaction to a well put point, then the crazy reaction can be due to no fault of your own, and then hopefully the spot light will fall on the people acting crazy, where objecively minded people will question the motives of the people acting crazy.

The question is: What is a well put and constructive way?

By the way, I was kind of hoping to see the Jutland Post print some pics of the DPP top three in Nazi uniforms...but then that may be too close to the truth. BUT it would be the acid test for Danish free speech, to see if ALL have equal opportunities at getting this kind of treatment.
magic1964  - wor...   |2009-09-30 09:01:30
In EUROPE Right wings politicians have been portrad with nazi uniforme since 1945.....IT´S BORING !!!!
wor  - magic1964   |2009-09-30 11:10:14
Thanks for your comment, magic1964.

I know that the idea of putting far right politicians in Nazi uniforms is not new...but often, the old tactics work the best.

Like I said in my comment: " it would be the acid TEST for Danish free speech, to see if ALL have EQUAL opportunities at getting this kind of treatment."

I'd like to direct your attention to the word "test" in my previous sentence.
Let's test what the reaction from certain groups would be when faced with what "they" would veiw as a character/image assasination.

If drawing muslims as terrorists depicts them as extremist, then depciting far right politicians as extremist can be done by depicting them as nazis.

We were told that muslims should not moan about the drawings. Let's find out if the far right politicians moan when giving the same test.

If the far right politicians moan when faced with the same treatment, then something must be wrong with their idea of free speech.

By the way, I remember in the pass Ms Pia K took someone to court for stating that she was a racist. Also, what about CPHPOST refering to DPP as "national socialist" and then getting hassled by the DPP. Freedom of speech?

Let's not make assumptions, let's test Danish freedom of speech and see what happens.
tomnashdk   |2009-09-30 12:07:41
Denmark reminds me of Berkeley, California, USA. Freedom of speech is protected and encouraged as long as it is extreme left-wing propaganda. When Benjamin Netanyahu tried to speak there the place went nuts with demonstrations and violence. Freedom of speech my ass, Denmark... I think the Nazi depiction is a great test that JP ought to try. Great idea, wor. The question is, does JP have the intestinal fortitude to put their money where their mouth is? I sincerely doubt it.
damestjernelys  - I drew   |2009-09-30 13:54:18
A cartoon of Pia Kjærsgaard in a KKK uniform once. No one cared.
wor  - Critical testing   |2009-09-30 14:48:15
Thanks for your comment, damestjernelys.

For the test to be carried out, it would have to be done "scientifically" correct as possible. Meaning we should recreate much of the same conditions during the test. Conditions such as: Same news paper, same page, same author, same amount of publicity etc.

Note that the test should also test the "path/mechanism" that creates the phenomenon we are trying to observe.
If we cannot abserve a phenomenon, maybe the test fails earlier in the chain due to JP not having the guts to publish the test as tomnashdk pointed out.

Remember the idea of the test is to see what happens, so the test pictures not being publish still gives a useful test results and points to JPs lack of "intestinal fortitude" (I like that phrase)

OH, I forgot to add that the test subjects should not know they are being tested. Woops!
 

 

Focus on

 

Failing the grade

A lack of international schools, especially those offering the International Baccalaureat...

 

Home sweet home?

Take part in the on-going debate over the quality of life for foreign professionals in De...

 

A gift in a time of crisis

The national government owes it to the rest of the country to promote growth in Greater C...

Copenhagen Podcast



image

 



JP International

The Tales of Hans Christian Andersen