The Copenhagen Post

Monday
March 15th
Front page News Commentary Homosexuality sells

Homosexuality sells

E-mail Print

Tourism marketing targeted at homosexuals reinforces stereotypes about a diverse group

As Copenhagen prepares for the arrival of participants in the World Outgames this week, the tourist industry is eagerly rubbing its hands in anticipation of the wealthy, well-educated and stylish influx of people the games will bring.

Or such is the popular image that the tourism industry paints of homosexuals – the primary audience for the Outgames and its accompanying conference on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) human rights.

LGBTQ tourists are increasingly becoming the desire of cities worldwide. And it is no wonder why: in the US alone homosexual travellers spend an estimated $64 billion annually, and a recent study found that each dollar invested in homosexual tourism marketing generates $153 in revenue.

The tourism industry in Copenhagen has a leg up on other destinations seeking to attract homosexuals, due to its relatively tolerant attitudes, and due to the fact that it boasts numerous homosexual ‘firsts’ – first gay bar, first national homosexual association, and first country to legally recognise same-sex unions.

Such openness about homosexuality also means that numerous public figures – including the city’s deputy mayor for environmental and technical issues – are openly gay, which has helped to anchor homosexuality as a modern social norm no different from race, ethnic heritage or disability.

But at the same time as homosexuals are breaking down barriers and increasingly being considered part of society’s mainstream, tourism industry marketing only serves to lump the vastly diverse group into one category based on a single trait, creating yet another stereotype.

Due to the limited size of the group – estimated to be between 2 and 13 percent in Western countries – homosexuals do represent an easily definable and significant marketing segment. But homosexuals come from all walks of life, and it is hard to see a difference in marketing to them as a group and marketing to heterosexuals as a group.

VisitCopenhagen.dk – the city’s official tourism website – singles out ‘Gays and Lesbians’, putting them on a par with ‘shoppers’ and ‘food lovers’, and the city prides itself on being an open and tolerant place for homosexuals. But one could ask whether their efforts to promote Copenhagen as a gay-friendly city would be so vigorous if homosexuals had a reputation as being ignorant cheapskates.

Comments
Only CPHPOST registered users can write comments!
tomsj  - I'm not sure what to say   |2009-07-25 12:32:01
In the US, the term homosexual is pejorative. It’s what the religious fanatics label us. It’s much like calling an African American a “nigger”. Is this not also true in Europe? I guess not. I find the use of the term offensive. We are “gay people,” not “homosexuals.” I would also have named the article “Gay Tourism Sells” rather than “Homosexuality Sells”. Homosexuality doesn’t sell anything, but gay tourists buy, don’t they?
tom1980   |2009-07-27 14:49:38
The answer is in the article near the bottom. (VisitCopenhagen.dk – the city’s official tourism website – singles out ‘Gays and Lesbians’).

Gay tends to refer to guys only, although it can refer to men and women.

saying homosexual is a clear way of refering men and women.
ShellyWilson  - I'm not sure what to say, either.   |2009-07-27 14:56:09
I guess I've been living under a rock in one of the largest metropolitan (and gay-friendly) areas in the US, but this is the first I've heard of "homosexual" being pejorative! You're kidding, right? Is "heterosexual" also not PC? Are bisexuals now offended by their distinction?

I'm particularly embarrassed that you would equate the word "homosexual," with a deeply offensive term for African-Americans. That word is probably one of the most devastating epithets in the English language. "Homosexual" isn't even in the ballpark.

Homosexual, like heterosexual and bisexual, is in fact, simply a clinical term. It can be used for better or worse, but the designation itself is neutral. That said, I'm perfectly proud of being homosexual.
nicks100  - context is key   |2009-07-27 20:22:34
In the geographic area and social group I belong to in Canada, 'homosexual' and its slang form 'gay' are used interchangeability--as are the terms 'heterosexual' and 'straight'. The only difference I would see is the tendency for the 'suffix+sexual' form to be used in a more scientific context.
Which words are classified as derogatory, I believe, depends on the societal context, especially when those words describe entire demographics. Given that, and the sheer size and diversity of the American population, I am sceptical of the assertion that all of the United States would agree with tomsj.
dianecarole  - Intentional offence   |2009-07-28 13:59:34
I was always taught that you should never take offence at something unless it was intended! So context is everthing, used correctly as a descriptive noun, then homosexual is acceptable. Shouted accross a bar in an agressive way, it is not!
Somone once told me 'I bet you were gorgeous when you were younger' Do you think I should have taken offence? It was meant as a compliment, such as you still look good now, so you must have been even more so 20 years ago!
 

 

Focus on

 

Failing the grade

A lack of international schools, especially those offering the International Baccalaureat...

 

Home sweet home?

Take part in the on-going debate over the quality of life for foreign professionals in De...

 

A gift in a time of crisis

The national government owes it to the rest of the country to promote growth in Greater C...

Copenhagen Podcast



image

 



JP International

The Tales of Hans Christian Andersen